Elsevier

Health Policy

Volume 110, Issues 2–3, May 2013, Pages 141-146
Health Policy

Growth in private payments for health care by Canadian households

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.healthpol.2013.01.014Get rights and content

Abstract

Introduction

Despite first-dollar public coverage for hospital and physician services, Canadians spend more privately on health care than citizens of most other developed countries. We quantified recent growth in private payments by Canadian households for health care.

Methods

Using data from 163,081 respondents to Statistics Canada's annual Survey of Household Spending from 1998 to 2009, we calculated inflation-adjusted per-household spending on private health insurance premiums and out-of-pocket payments on six types of health care services. Further, we estimated the prevalence and some socio-economic determinants of households spending over 10% of after-tax income on health care using logistic regression.

Results

We found that Canadian households spent $19.8 billion on private payments for health care in 2009. This represents an average of $1523 per household—a 37% increase over 1998. The top three spending categories in 2009 were private health insurance premiums ($5.9 billion), dental ($4.9 billion) and prescription drugs ($4.2 billion). Even after adjusting for inflation, expenditure on every category of health care spending increased between 1998 and 2009. The proportion of households spending more than 10% of after-tax income on health care increased by 56% (from 3.3% to 5.2%). Households including a senior, with a low income, and in British Columbia or the Atlantic Provinces were significantly more likely to reach this threshold.

Interpretation

Over the period studied, the burden of private health care expenditures increased substantially for Canadian households. As direct charges reduce the use of necessary health care services, investigation into the health consequences of these increases is warranted.

Introduction

Despite the perception that Canada has a “public health care system,” the country actually relies on private financing of health care more than most comparable countries. Private expenditures on health care in Canada totalled $1569 per capita in 2010, the third highest level in the OECD—trailing only the predominantly private-insurance systems of the United States and Switzerland [1]. This is because Canada's first-dollar public insurance system covers only medically necessary physician and hospital services. Other important components of modern health care, including home care, prescription drugs, dental care, and vision care, are largely privately financed [2].

There are two major sources of private financing in Canada: employers and individuals. Employers make payments toward private health insurance costs when offered to their employees. When paid by the employer these contributions are not taxable (except provincially in Quebec); these exemptions reduced taxes by $3.2 billion in 2011 [3]. Individuals can also make payments toward private insurance premiums if required by their employer or if they purchase their own individual insurance policy. In addition, individuals can be required to make direct out-of-pocket payments at the point of care. This includes user-charges under both private and public insurance programs (e.g., deductibles and co-insurance for pharmaceuticals and dental care [4]) as well as all payments by the uninsured.

The reduction of financial barriers to care and protection of households against catastrophic out-of-pocket health costs are recognized goals for health financing systems [5]. Direct user charges may cause individuals to forgo needed care with negative (and potentially costly) health consequences. They can also have implications for equity in health care financing [6], [7]. Significant out-of-pocket costs for care as a proportion of income can threaten the economic well-being of households, and result in sacrifices in other necessity spending, particularly for those with lower incomes [8]. Despite the importance of private spending, we have very limited knowledge regarding the types, trends and burden of private health care expenditures by Canadian households. Therefore, we studied the trends and distributions of household spending on private health benefits premiums and out-of-pocket charges for six types of health care services in Canada.

Section snippets

Data and variables

We used data from each wave of Statistics Canada's annual survey of household spending (SHS) from 1998 to 2009. We specifically selected these years because prior and subsequent years used different data collection methods and are thus not directly comparable [9]. The data from each year is cross-sectional in nature and was collected using similar methods over time.

SHS data is collected through an in-person interview and involves verification against receipts and other household documentation.

Results

We found that Canadian households spent $19.8 billion on health care in 2009 (Table 1). After adjusting for inflation to year-2009 dollars, we found the average Canadian household spent approximately $1112 on health services in 1998 and $1523 in 2009 (Fig. 1). This represents a 37.0% increase overall, or an annual growth rate of 2.9% over inflation.

As shown in Table 1, the largest single category of household spending in 2009 was private health insurance premiums, at a household average of $452

Discussion

Canadians have long held to the notion that health care services should be available on the basis of need rather than ability to pay. Nevertheless, we found that health care expenditures faced by Canadian households are substantial and have increased considerably over the past decade. The last published study of private household spending on health care indicated that expenditures increased 1.3% per year in real terms between 1978 and 1997 [15]. We found that between 1998 and 2009 this annual

Limitations

The impact of out-of-pocket payments cannot be fully investigated in this study as it does not capture households who chose not to seek care due to cost. Further, as expenditure data in the survey is based on self-report, our responses may suffer from recall bias. However, Statistics Canada is rigorous in its verification of spending against household documentation and there is little reason to think this bias would have changed between subsequent waves of the survey. It is also unknown whether

Conclusion

Proposals to use direct patient charges for hospital and physician services have provoked a long and heated debate in Canada. However, there has been much less debate about the existing use of out-of-pocket charges for many important health care services, nor the growth in premiums paid by households for supplementary private health insurance. Recently, prominent commentators have suggested that increased direct out-of-pocket payments by patients are a viable option to manage public healthcare

Conflicts of Interest

Michael Law has consulted for Health Canada on unrelated research projects. Steven Morgan has been a consultant to federal and provincial governments on matters related to pharmaceutical policy. All other authors report no conflicts of interest.

Acknowledgements

This study was supported by an operating grant from the Canadian Institutes of Health Research (MOP-221233, “For Whom the Bill Tolls: Private Drug Insurance in Canada”, P.I. Michael Law). Dr. Law receives salary support through a New Investigator Award from the Canadian Institutes of Health Research and a Career Investigator Award from the Michael Smith Foundation for Health Research.

References (28)

  • S.C. Government of Canada

    Survey of household spending (SHS)

    (2009)
  • J.S. Banthin et al.

    Changes in financial burdens for health care: national estimates for the population younger than 65 years, 1996–2003

    JAMA: The Journal of the American Medical Association

    (2006)
  • J.S. Banthin et al.

    Financial Burden Of Health Care, 2001–2004

    Health Affairs

    (2008)
  • P.J. Cunningham

    Despite the recession's effects on incomes and jobs, the share of people with high medical costs was mostly unchanged

    Health Affairs

    (2012)
  • Cited by (0)

    View full text