Drugs, sex, money and power: An HPV vaccine case study
Introduction
“It took 15 years for Gardasil to make a national hero of its creator, Ian Frazer. But it took just three days for the world's first cancer-preventing vaccine to make a national dill of federal Health Minister Tony Abbott. […] John Howard, alert as ever to the public mood, delivered sparkling prime ministerial endorsement to Gardasil along with a clear direction to Minister Abbott that the immunisation program should proceed. And pronto.” [1].
“[T]he public, as well as policy-makers, must be provided with sound and comprehensive multidisciplinary evidence for vaccination as well as unbiased data about the potential benefits and harms expected from widespread immunization with the HPV vaccine, and all this information must come before governments allocate huge sums of already limited health care dollars to such programs. Individual girls and women, as well as policy-makers, can only make truly informed decisions about vaccinations when they have all the evidence. At this point in time, there are more questions than answers.” [2, p. 16].
In this paper, we analyse and compare the experiences of seven countries (Australia, Canada, Denmark, Germany, New Zealand, Switzerland and the U.S.) in considering the world's first cervical cancer-preventing vaccine and making a decision about its introduction and/or funding. The above quotations nicely illustrate two characteristics of this process. First, on the whole, the countries considered here approved the HPV vaccine and related programs with marked haste, some circumventing established channels and procedures in the process. Second, public debates ensued in many countries, fuelled by uncertainties about the duration of the vaccine's efficacy and the precise nature of the link between HPV and cervical cancer. Because vaccine programs are still new, the rate of the HPV vaccine's uptake—and its impact on routine Pap test utilization—remains largely to be determined. With respect to the establishment of such programs, however, our analysis suggests that countries with different decision-making processes can arrive at a similar decision about the value of a health policy or program, a pattern that reflects the influence of a particularly strong and ubiquitous set of political pressures at work.
Section snippets
Materials and methods
The International Network Health Policy and Reform1
Human Papillomavirus and the development of a vaccine
Worldwide, cervical cancer is the second most common cancer among women [15]; nearly half a million women are diagnosed with and more than 270,000 die of the disease each year [16]. Of the more than 100 HPV strains that infect humans, more than 20 are linked to cervical cancer [17]. Cervical cancer is a rare outcome of a fairly common infection with HPV; in the majority of cases HPV infections are transient and asymptomatic [18], [19].
Nonetheless, the establishment of a viral cause of cervical
Comparing and contrasting the approval process
In all seven countries considered here, the vaccine was approved for use in 2006 and made available to women as a three-dose schedule for between 292 PPP-$ and 527 PPP-$2 (see also Table 1). Although there was debate in the scientific community about issues of safety and efficacy in connection with the approval process, the public debate, which is the subject
Role of the manufacturers
In countries with a pharmaceutical industry, manufacturers adopt practices designed to enhance the chances of their product being recommended, approved or subsidized. Such practices include employing lobbyists, engaging the media, and identifying potentially supportive groups within the community. In this case, the presence of the manufacturer was more obvious in some countries than in others, and its public profile varied. In Canada, Germany and the U.S., public perception that Merck, Sharp
Implementation and outcomes of the policy
In all countries except the U.S., HPV vaccination programs, whether delivered as a school-based program or via a health insurance package, are being offered on a voluntary basis. In the U.S., making vaccines mandatory for school enrolment is commonly accepted as a nearly foolproof means of achieving universal vaccination, but HPV vaccine mandates proved to be a failure in state legislatures across the country. More than a dozen states, however, approved related legislation, allotting funding to
Discussion
Although the scientific issues associated with the HPV vaccine are not unique, the case illustrates important issues associated with the interpretation of scientific knowledge for policy-making purposes. The overall objectives of a vaccination program are to reduce the morbidity and mortality associated with cervical cancer. However, the relationship between many HPV strains and morbidity and mortality is very complex and not well understood. Thus, there is, as yet, no direct scientific proof
Conclusion
The speedy introduction of a subsidized vaccination program across a number of developed countries represents a convergence of interests, whether motivated by profit or public health. Lessons about how to influence the public debate and maintain pressure on bureaucrats and politicians will not have been lost on advocates and lobbyists. Supporters of vaccination programs used the values of caring (for your daughter) and prevention (of cancer) to effectively argue for the vaccine's subsidy. Both
Acknowledgements
We are grateful to Revital Gross (Myers-JDC-Brookdale Institute, Jerusalem, Israel) and Gerard Anderson (Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health) for their helpful feedback on the draft of this paper.
References (57)
- et al.
Human papillomavirus infection: epidemiology and pathophysiology
Gynecologic Oncology
(2007) - et al.
The Australian funding debate on quadrivalent HPV vaccine: a case study for the national pharmaceutical policy
Health Policy
(2008) - Stevens M. Howard rescues Gardasil from Abbott poison pill. Comment. The Australian; November 11,...
- Canadian Women's Health Network. HPV, vaccines, and gender: policy considerations, www.cwhn.ca/PDF/CWHN_HPVjuly30.pdf;...
- Blum K. HPV vaccination in Germany. Health Policy Monitor; January...
- Chastonay P. HPV vaccination in Switzerland: where are we? Health Policy Monitor; October...
- Conis E, Medlin C. HPV vaccinations in California. Health Policy Monitor; April...
- Franklin R. HPV vaccination. Health Policy Monitor; October...
- Haas M. Government response to PBAC recommendations. Health Policy Monitor; March...
- Torgerson R, MacAdam M. HPV vaccine funded in Canada. Health Policy Monitor; October...
Prevalence of human papillomavirus in cervical cancer: a worldwide perspective. International biological study on cervical cancer (IBSCC) Study Group
Journal of the National Cancer Institute
Natural history of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia: a critical review
International Journal of Gynecological Pathology
The causal relation between human papillomavirus and cervical cancer
Journal of Clinical Pathology
Against which human papillomavirus types shall we vaccinate and screen? The international perspective
International Journal of Cancer
Controversial new vaccine to prevent cervical cancer
Bulletin of the World Health Organization
Human papillomavirus, vaccines and women's health: questions and cautions
Canadian Medical Association Journal
Cited by (41)
Turning suffering into side effects: Responses to HPV vaccination in Colombia
2021, Social Science and MedicineCitation Excerpt :The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved Merck's Gardasil 4 in 2006, while the European Medicines Agency (EMA) approved GSK's Cervarix in 2007, in both cases for girls and young women only. No modern vaccine introduction had been accompanied by a similar level of public debate, though what exactly was debated and by whom differed from country to country (Haas et al., 2009). In the USA, for example, a recommendation for HPV vaccination to be made compulsory provoked powerful opposition from an unusual alliance.
Evidence-informed vaccine decision making: The introduction of Human Papilloma Virus (HPV) vaccination in the Netherlands
2019, Health PolicyCitation Excerpt :In addition, Silva et al. found that the advisory process of the National Health Council could be more transparent; this was also debated in parliament regarding the report by the National Health Council on HPV vaccination [19]. This study adds to the body of literature [14–16] on the decision-making process of vaccine introduction by focusing on parliamentary documents, and performs a detailed analysis of the actual use of evidence in decision making. It gives insight into the information used in the different stages of the policymaking process by the different stakeholder groups.
Imagining the future to enhance prevention today
2015, American Journal of Preventive MedicineConceptual frameworks and key dimensions to support coverage decisions for vaccines
2015, VaccineCitation Excerpt :Policy makers must often support recommendations on the introduction of new vaccines without a transparent, structured and independent assessment process. This frequently occurs in situations characterised by considerable external pressure from the general public and those with vested interests [31–33]. Expert opinions may vary greatly as the unstructured approach leads to selective reporting of dimensions that confirm a priori beliefs [34].
Health care professional communication about STI vaccines with adolescents and parents
2014, VaccineCitation Excerpt :This created negative press, including within the scientific community [51,52]. Similar experiences occurred in other countries where HPV vaccination recommendations were incorporated quickly into national programs and policies [53]. The ensuing controversies reduced public support of HPV vaccination [54] and could have altered the conversation between HCPs and patients.
Political and News Media Factors Shaping Public Awareness of the HPV Vaccine
2013, Women's Health IssuesCitation Excerpt :In 2006, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration licensed a vaccine for the human papillomavirus (HPV) that prevents the strains of HPV that cause 70% of cervical cancers. Within months, states introduced legislation requiring the vaccine for girls, prompting intense media discussion and debate over the vaccine's merits and potential concerns (Colgrove, Abiola, & Mello, 2010; Haas et al., 2009). Politicians, health professionals, conservative groups, women's health organizations, and researchers competed to have their message heard in the news media (Fowler, Gollust, Dempsey, Lantz, & Ubel, 2012), as legislative discussions over HPV vaccine requirements, education, and insurance coverage unfolded after 2006 across more than 40 states (National Conference of State Legislatures, 2012).